<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #bowlerhats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publicstrategist.com/2012/06/bowlerhats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2012/06/bowlerhats/</link>
	<description>Working to make government work better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:32:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Delivery by Default - In The Eye Of The Storm</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2012/06/bowlerhats/comment-page-1/#comment-21938</link>
		<dc:creator>Delivery by Default - In The Eye Of The Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 07:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=4188#comment-21938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] then read @pubstrat’s thinking on bowler hats and was drawn to remember another slide deck from around the same time:    The road to reform is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then read @pubstrat’s thinking on bowler hats and was drawn to remember another slide deck from around the same time:    The road to reform is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Schillemore</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2012/06/bowlerhats/comment-page-1/#comment-21652</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Schillemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=4188#comment-21652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this blog. 

I worked for HMRC and lived through several painful restructures before I left, including the merger of the Inland Revenue with Customs and Excise. Although I now understand the thought behind the use of the hashtag (i.e. this is what we were, we&#039;ll now change those perceptions) it felt like a &quot;joke&quot; hashtag. This should not be the case over what, for a lot of people, will be a very serious issue.

A hashtag ought to be obvious from the start - although a lot of thought had gone into it, readers may not give the same amount of thought and come up with a different conclusion.

And, echoing other comments, many thanks to Emer and her team for taking on the feedback.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this blog. </p>
<p>I worked for HMRC and lived through several painful restructures before I left, including the merger of the Inland Revenue with Customs and Excise. Although I now understand the thought behind the use of the hashtag (i.e. this is what we were, we&#8217;ll now change those perceptions) it felt like a &#8220;joke&#8221; hashtag. This should not be the case over what, for a lot of people, will be a very serious issue.</p>
<p>A hashtag ought to be obvious from the start &#8211; although a lot of thought had gone into it, readers may not give the same amount of thought and come up with a different conclusion.</p>
<p>And, echoing other comments, many thanks to Emer and her team for taking on the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lizzy Bell</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2012/06/bowlerhats/comment-page-1/#comment-21651</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizzy Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=4188#comment-21651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pleased that Emer&#039;s listening to the comments on this. We&#039;ve been through several major and very difficult restructures in the last 18 months. The prospect of another one doesn&#039;t seem like a subject for jokey hashtags. I hope this does stop being used today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pleased that Emer&#8217;s listening to the comments on this. We&#8217;ve been through several major and very difficult restructures in the last 18 months. The prospect of another one doesn&#8217;t seem like a subject for jokey hashtags. I hope this does stop being used today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2012/06/bowlerhats/comment-page-1/#comment-21646</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=4188#comment-21646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent post and very considered. This hash tag bothered me a bit yesterday, but fair play to Emer and co for acknowledging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post and very considered. This hash tag bothered me a bit yesterday, but fair play to Emer and co for acknowledging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
