<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital inclusion:  how do you tell?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publicstrategist.com/2010/03/digital-inclusion-how-do-you-tell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/03/digital-inclusion-how-do-you-tell/</link>
	<description>Working to make government work better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Four short links: 11 March 2010 &#171; Murder Manual</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/03/digital-inclusion-how-do-you-tell/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Four short links: 11 March 2010 &#171; Murder Manual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=870#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Inclusion: How Do You Tell? &#8212; [N]either means nor skills are simple binary states. A while ago, I was talking to a young man looking for a job, and asked him why he didn&#8217;t look online. Because it&#8217;s two buses to get to the public library and you only get half an hour, was his reply. Or being in a library myself and watching an older man asking a bit tentatively if he could use one of the computers and being firmly told that he could book a slot for three days time. He turned away looking crestfallen and without making a booking. It didn&#8217;t look as though he would be back. Remote, uncertain, and limited access is better than none. But it is hardly inclusion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Inclusion: How Do You Tell? &#8212; [N]either means nor skills are simple binary states. A while ago, I was talking to a young man looking for a job, and asked him why he didn&#8217;t look online. Because it&#8217;s two buses to get to the public library and you only get half an hour, was his reply. Or being in a library myself and watching an older man asking a bit tentatively if he could use one of the computers and being firmly told that he could book a slot for three days time. He turned away looking crestfallen and without making a booking. It didn&#8217;t look as though he would be back. Remote, uncertain, and limited access is better than none. But it is hardly inclusion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

