<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The passing of the years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/the-passing-of-the-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/the-passing-of-the-years/</link>
	<description>Working to make government work better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Public Strategist</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/the-passing-of-the-years/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>Public Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=906#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>I am sure that&#039;s right, and I think it&#039;s still the case that the ideal form factor for a book is a book.  But what really struck me is just how slow conventional book publishing (and probably academic publishing in particular) now feels.  Even if we want to end up with books, there seems to be something enormously inefficient about the production process - something analogous here to &lt;a href=&quot;http://benhammersley.com/2009/12/e-books-the-bigger-problem-part-one-of-three/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ben Hammersley&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; posts about how the entire production model for magazines needs to change in an online world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that&#8217;s right, and I think it&#8217;s still the case that the ideal form factor for a book is a book.  But what really struck me is just how slow conventional book publishing (and probably academic publishing in particular) now feels.  Even if we want to end up with books, there seems to be something enormously inefficient about the production process &#8211; something analogous here to <a href="http://benhammersley.com/2009/12/e-books-the-bigger-problem-part-one-of-three/" rel="nofollow">Ben Hammersley&#8217;s</a> posts about how the entire production model for magazines needs to change in an online world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Briggs</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/the-passing-of-the-years/comment-page-1/#comment-1432</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=906#comment-1432</guid>
		<description>I agree on the oddness of converting online content into hardcopy books. I suspect though that by doing so you manage to get content in front of eyes that just aren&#039;t used to reading stuff on a screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the oddness of converting online content into hardcopy books. I suspect though that by doing so you manage to get content in front of eyes that just aren&#8217;t used to reading stuff on a screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

