<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How low is the common denominator?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/how-low-is-the-common-denominator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/how-low-is-the-common-denominator/</link>
	<description>Working to make government work better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks for January 13th through January 17th</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/how-low-is-the-common-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks for January 13th through January 17th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=929#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>[...] How low is the common denominator? &#124; Public Strategist &#8211; &quot;Do brilliant ideas have to have polarised responses, or can they be brilliant and inclusive?&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How low is the common denominator? | Public Strategist &#8211; &quot;Do brilliant ideas have to have polarised responses, or can they be brilliant and inclusive?&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention How low is the common denominator? &#124; Public Strategist -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/how-low-is-the-common-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention How low is the common denominator? &#124; Public Strategist -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=929#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sebchan, Stefan Czerniawski, staplegun, PublicSectorBloggers, CAN and others. CAN said: RT @sebchan: Reading: How low is the common denominator? &#124; Public Strategist http://bit.ly/4Ex5Qa #gov2au [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sebchan, Stefan Czerniawski, staplegun, PublicSectorBloggers, CAN and others. CAN said: RT @sebchan: Reading: How low is the common denominator? | Public Strategist <a href="http://bit.ly/4Ex5Qa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4Ex5Qa</a> #gov2au [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2010/01/how-low-is-the-common-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=929#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Would reccommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edemocracycentre.ch/files/WP2007-2%20-%20Mendez%20-%20eDemocracy%20Experiences%20in%20Europe.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this paper&lt;/a&gt; by Fernando Mendez for some philosophical background.

It highlights Sir Karl Popper&#039;s argument that &quot;you cannot introduce a political reform without strengthening the opposing forces, to a degree roughly in ratio to the scope of the reform&quot;... seems this applies as much to egovernment and edemocracy as it does to any other political change.

It also makes the interesting point that e-government and e-democracy reforms, given their potential to upset the status quo not just in terms of political processes but also in electoral outcomes, resource allocation and policy delivery and the associated bureaucratic structures &quot;will not necessarily be perceived as politically neutral&quot;... another reason why there can be reactions against change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would reccommend <a href="http://www.edemocracycentre.ch/files/WP2007-2%20-%20Mendez%20-%20eDemocracy%20Experiences%20in%20Europe.pdf" rel="nofollow">this paper</a> by Fernando Mendez for some philosophical background.</p>
<p>It highlights Sir Karl Popper&#8217;s argument that &#8220;you cannot introduce a political reform without strengthening the opposing forces, to a degree roughly in ratio to the scope of the reform&#8221;&#8230; seems this applies as much to egovernment and edemocracy as it does to any other political change.</p>
<p>It also makes the interesting point that e-government and e-democracy reforms, given their potential to upset the status quo not just in terms of political processes but also in electoral outcomes, resource allocation and policy delivery and the associated bureaucratic structures &#8220;will not necessarily be perceived as politically neutral&#8221;&#8230; another reason why there can be reactions against change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

