<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Customers, citizens and claimants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publicstrategist.com/2008/02/customers-citizens-and-claimants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2008/02/customers-citizens-and-claimants/</link>
	<description>Working to make government work better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The patients have run out &#124; Public Strategist</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2008/02/customers-citizens-and-claimants/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>The patients have run out &#124; Public Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=103#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>[...] exactly two years ago, I wrote a post about the word we should use for the people who use government services. Its opening paragraph was: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exactly two years ago, I wrote a post about the word we should use for the people who use government services. Its opening paragraph was: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucinda</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2008/02/customers-citizens-and-claimants/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucinda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=103#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I worked with &quot;claimants&quot; in the 80&#039;s.  I hated the power:powerlessness relationship that existed, which many colleagues exploited and even enjoyed.  Then along came an inspirational chief executive who invented customers for us. Attitudes and behaviours shifted dramatically as a result -  amazingly quickly for such a profound change.  And to me, the change was worth the label.  Who should really care what we call customers?  Customers don&#039;t.  (And actually we don&#039;t really call them that to their faces, as surely as we never said &quot;dear claimant&quot;).  Customers care about the service we give them, not what we call them.  And if calling customers customers means we give them a better service, then who but the customer should care?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked with &#8220;claimants&#8221; in the 80&#8242;s.  I hated the power:powerlessness relationship that existed, which many colleagues exploited and even enjoyed.  Then along came an inspirational chief executive who invented customers for us. Attitudes and behaviours shifted dramatically as a result &#8211;  amazingly quickly for such a profound change.  And to me, the change was worth the label.  Who should really care what we call customers?  Customers don&#8217;t.  (And actually we don&#8217;t really call them that to their faces, as surely as we never said &#8220;dear claimant&#8221;).  Customers care about the service we give them, not what we call them.  And if calling customers customers means we give them a better service, then who but the customer should care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Birch</title>
		<link>http://publicstrategist.com/2008/02/customers-citizens-and-claimants/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Birch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicstrategist.com/?p=103#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Customer just doesn&#039;t work in this context.  What&#039;s wrong with &quot;serf&quot;?  I think it sums up our relationship with public bodies quite well, and it also lends itself &quot;surf&quot; for when you are using online services, like getting a tax disc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Customer just doesn&#8217;t work in this context.  What&#8217;s wrong with &#8220;serf&#8221;?  I think it sums up our relationship with public bodies quite well, and it also lends itself &#8220;surf&#8221; for when you are using online services, like getting a tax disc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
